GREAT article its been a long time coming. I love Q and Stan and applaud what they have accomplished, but I also recognize how the plate was set for them. They have both made mistakes, but also managed to reboot and win another cup. All I want to know is WHY? Why Brookbank instead of an actual winger? Why so little lice time when he does skate (I actually know this one already but it just reinforces the first query). Why don't you like Morin? Why play Zues any higher than the 4th line occasionally? Why Bollig over Versteeg on the PK? and Why Bollig every fucking game?
|Print article||This entry was posted by mightymikeD on November 27, 2013 at 12:09 pm, and is filed under Chicago Blackhawks. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.|
For an article that's getting a lot of love on the Twitaarghs, there's no comments. So I'll start.
Nice job, mmD. Well written and stated. Although, to play a little devil's advocate, it is likely that the beat reporters are asking "Why, Joel?". Whether or not they're getting a response that's even worth reporting is the question. And of course, if their livelihood depends on that sort of access, how far they'll push for a secondary, "No, seriously, why?" is probably nowhere near as far as the masses on twitter/blogs will scream for.
I'll agree with that. But if they're asking the question and gettiing stonewalled/fobbed off then they sure as hell aren't talking about it as much as they smirkingly report "We'll see=Yes in Q-Speak". I undestand the circumstances they operate in but I seriously doubt a Kuc or Sassone or Lazerus or Myers will get the boot just for asking some questions.