Losing Faith: Stan Bowman Mistakes Resemble Blackhawks’ Dark History
I’ve read several pieces in the last 3 weeks singing the praises of Blackhawks General Manager Stan Bowman. Not necessarily with support for his latest moves, but spewing statements like, “There’s a reason he’s GM and you’re not,” and “He’s done a great job so far, we have no reason to doubt him.”
How quickly you forget. I, however, have not.
Let’s start by saying that there is a lot to like about the Blackhawks’ moves this off-season. We now have eight players on one-year deals, or in the last year of a multiple-year deal. Additionally, as of now, we have a full roster and $3+ million in cap space to play with. The combination of these factors means the Blackhawks have room to deal throughout the season, and plenty of options when the season is over. Credit Bowman for those moves, and also for the savvy signings of wingers Michael Frolik and Viktor Stalberg. That having been said, there is trouble on the horizon.
Stan Bowman is the 6th General Manager for the Chicago Blackhawks in what let’s call “recent history:” the period of time dating back to the beginning of Mike Keenan’s tenure as GM in 1990. The history of those 21 years has been one of ignorance and denial: foolishly squandering draft picks and free agent talent in favor of aging veterans, and eventually putting a team on the ice more suited to WWF cage matches than the speed and skill game the league was moving towards.
Essentially, a freshly-hired GM was given a chance to put a new type of team on the ice, then was abruptly replaced by Old Man Wirtz’ go-to guy, Uncle Bob Pulford, who turned the team into the Charlestown Chiefs all over again. This misguided and idiotic strategy resulted in some of the worst lineups ever seen in the Indian Head sweater, and the second-longest playoff drought in Blackhawks history.
Only the twin coincidences of Dale “Gilligan” Tallon’s appointment to the GM post and Old Man Wirtz’ death allowed the Stanley Cup Championship season in 2009-10. Had those two things not happened in the sequence that they did, we would not be where we are today.
How does this relate to Stan Bowman? Read on…
There were two patterns that were seen one season after another in the dark years between 1990 and 2005. The first was laying out the “wish list” of positional players to be acquired in the free agent signing season, then refusing to pay market price to acquire any of them. The second was refusing to negotiate on reasonable terms with restricted free-agents, and ultimately losing the services of talented players while the old bastard sat in his walnut-paneled office counting his beer sales revenue and muttering, “There isn’t a player alive who is worth a million dollars a year.”
So now we see Stan Bowman declaring openly and repeatedly in May of this year that he was going to acquire a big, tough center to play on the second line. That didn’t happen, and not only that, but Stan and Head Coach Joel Quenneville are both now spewing the transparent nonsense that going with Patrick Sharp as the second line center was the plan all along. That’s a demonstrable lie, and was done to put a better face on the fact that Stan refused to pay market price for the player he needed.
Then Blackhawks’ defenseman Chris Campoli files for arbitration, and we see the second pattern rear its ugly head. We have a restricted free agent asking the arbitrator for a salary he would likely get from another team (that’s the definition of “market price”, folks), and StanBow not only replaces Campoli with Sami Lepisto in a very public transaction, but puts the final nail in the coffin by announcing that he had stopped negotiations with Campoli’s agent! Once the arbitration award of $2.5 million was announced on Wednesday (a decisive win for Campoli), the Blackhawks walked away. Campoli is now free to sign with whomever he wants, and the Blackhawks will receive nothing in return.
This is the equivalent of drawing 4 cards, then laying your hand face up on the table, going all in, then folding. It’s been a long time since I saw such a stupid series of moves on the part of a team’s GM.
The way to handle this was to work multiple teams to trade either Campoli or Niklas Hjalmarsson, and once the trade was consummated, then go and acquire the replacement player. I know 6th-graders who can figure that out, but somehow it eluded Stan Bowman. It wasn’t as if Lepisto’s agent had multiple offers on the table and Stan had to rush to get him before he got snapped up. That transaction could just as easily have taken place on August 31.
Returning to the patterns from the dark years of this team is a sure-fire path to catastrophe. You must pay market price for players, that’s an immutable fact of sports-business. You must put experienced, position-dedicated players on the ice, or you’re going to miss the playoffs. You must negotiate in good faith with your restricted free agents, or you will lose talented players. And you must keep your cards close to your vest in all circumstances, or you may as well take millions of dollars out of the bank and set it on fire.
Stan Bowman’s rookie season is over, and he’s used up his get-out-of-jail-free cards. He’s fucking up, and it’s getting worse. We’re all too quick to make excuses for the lad, because of his father, and because of the team’s recent success. But this kind of thing had better stop, and quickly; otherwise we will all have a front-row seat as another in a long line of incompetent GM’s flushes the storied Blackhawks team down the shitter.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Tim Currell on July 21, 2011 at 7:31 am, and is filed under 2010-11 Offseason, 2011 Off-Season, Blackhawks, Chicago Blackhawks. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
David, feel free to disagree all you want with the post - as I clearly do, judging by my post a couple of days ago. However, if you're going to comment and start calling people names, do your research. It doesn't surprise me someone dumb enough to publicly use the term 'dipweed' doesn't know that Campoli's agent, the Blackhawks, the NHL and the NHLPA agree to expedite the hearing to allow Campoli to become an unrestricted free agent sooner than Aug. 3 to give him more time to sign with another team. It already happened, it was for $2.5 million, and the Blackhawks officially walked away. Dipweed.
as far as the center position goes, you mentioned them wanting to put sharp there, but it also looks like they may be trying to promote from within by means of marcu kruger. http://blackhawks.nhl.com/club/blogpost.htm?id=1352
i love how Bartl had the exact opposite view point on bowman a few days earlier... i'm gonna go ahead and side with jeff on this one.
Thoughtful article and thoughtful comments here. This is my biggest pet peeve with people that comment anonymously. Everyone's opinion has the same worth. FYI: Mark Bell attempting NHL comeback with Ducks. Maybe Kyle Calder and Tyler Arnason will join him? Discuss.
And another thing Tim, regarding your concluding comments: "You must pay market price for players, that’s an immutable fact of sports-business." Yes but there's a difference between market value and team value. A player may be valued at X on the open market, but that doesn't mean thats his value to a team and their cap structure (ie. paying James Wisnewski $5.5 million doesn't fit most teams, but to the Blue Jackets, he's their No. 1 d-man, so they're paying him like their No. 1) So I would change it to: "You must pay market price for players, but each player will have intristic and relative value to each team according to that player's expected role and that team's given cap structure" I think Bowman, more than a lot of other GM's, understands this principle. "You must put experienced, position-dedicated players on the ice, or you’re going to miss the playoffs." The most successful team's (and I mean cup winners or finalists) over the past several years have had perfect mixes of skill, speed, size, toughness, character, leadership and experience. So I would change it to: "You must put players with various tools and assets, tangible and intangible, on the ice or you won't be a successful team" Last season it was clear the Blackhawks were strong in some departments and weak in others. Bowman has strengthened the categories they were weak in and brought in a strong blend of players with different weapons at their disposal.
Tim, there are so many flaws here I don't know where to begin. "...foolishly squandering draft picks and free agent talent in favor of aging veterans and eventually putting a team on the ice more suited to WWF cage matches than the speed and skill game the league was moving towards." In this tiny excerpt I can find at least 4 massive flaws: 1. The Blackhawks have built and maintained one of the strongest systems of prospects in the NHL. In the last two drafts alone we've drafted 21 players. In the 2011 draft we had more picks than any other contendeing team. And they have all 7 of their picks in the next two drafts. I don't see where this "foolishly squandering draft picks" comes into fruition. 2. When it comes to squandering free agent talent, I'll ask you: how many elite players were available in this year's free agent class? And how many of them wouldn't have cost the 'Hawks the proverbial farm? Do you want to pay Tim Connolly close to $5 million, cause I don't. Do you want to spend all our cap space on Brad Richards to play a second line role and have absolutely no depth at all, cause that's not how you win championships. 3. I think its pretty clear from the results of the 2011 Stanley Cup Finals that the league, at least in the playoffs, is moving towards a game that favors teams with considerable toughness and grit. We witnessed a skill and speed team like Vancouver, who was built in a similar fashion to the 'Hawks, get absolutely beaten, brusied and bullied to the point that they couldn't even play anymore. And I'm guessing Stan was watching and thinking to himself "hey, we need to toughen up if we want to win another cup." 4. I think you're missing what Bowman is doing, his formula, for lack of a better word. The 'Hawks' core is in place, and its one of the best in the NHL, without a doubt. And it doesn't need changes. It doesn't need a Richards or a Stamkos or a Weber or Doughty. We have our elite, well-paid players. We need the cheap but effective role players that everyone bragged about when we won the cup. Bowman's formula is to cycle these kinds of players on and off the roster with one-year deals, which maintains flexibility, and hope that they compliment the core and provide them the tools to maximize their effectiveness. Meanwhile, this provides time for a our prospects to mature and develop and eventually take permanent roles on the team. Its a cyclical process. This is how you sustain a contending team. Don't believe me, ask Detroit, they've been doing it probably since before we were born. With regards to Campoli, there's a whole dynamic you neglected to mention: a players value to the team. I thought Neal Schmidt laid it out quite nicely on BlackhawkUp. The Blackhawks wanted Campoli for a third pairing role. Campoli wanted second pairing money. You don't pay a third pairing defenseman second pairing money, regardless of what his market value is. That's not paying market value, that's overpaying, because his role on your team is only valued at X, thus paying him Z would be overpaying him according to your cap structure (a term Bowman used more than once when describing negotiations with Campoli). To other teams, Campoli may be valued as a second pairing guy and paid accordingly, but he wasn't with the Blackhawks. As far as trading him goes, it was going to be near impossible to trade him off the bat. It was clear that negotiations were going sour and what GM is going to trade for a player who files for arbitration? Maybe you would Tim, but I think most GM's around the league know that they shouldn't pay for something they can get for free. And really, what could the Blackhawks get for Campoli? A 6th or 7th round pick? I won't lose sleep over that.
"Once the arbitration award of $2.5 million was announced on Wednesday (a decisive win for Campoli)" You are aware arbitration is non-binding in the NHL right? This was a decisive win for exactly nobody. Ask Niemi about his arbitration "win" with the Hawks. He signed for 750,000 less. Secondly, you really have no idea how hard Stan worked to trade Campoli. Your own comments actually back up the thought he exhausted all possible trade options before declaring negotiations were over. No one, and I mean no one smart enough to tie his own shoes announces this without trying to move him.
For all the hate Campoli got after game 7 I never would have guessed so many people wanted him to stick around. It sucks that he's gone, for sure. But take a larger view of what's going on here - "We now have eight players on one-year deals, or in the last year of a multiple-year deal." You said it yourself. All of the one year deals means that we're looking at temporary solutions here- it means Stan has a plan that he's not quite ready to pull the trigger on just yet. The way I see it, we have a LOT of promising prospects in the system, and I think it's a system that turns out great players. I think all these signings just indicate that Stan has faith in our up-and-comers. I think Stan went into Campoli's negotiations wanting to keep him around- I feel like Campoli is much better suited to fill Soupy's absence than Leddy right now, and Campoli seems like he fits really well on our blue line. What Stan probably doesn't want right now is another blue liner with a long contract, or a contract that's pricey for what you get. Campoli looked really promising, but that doesn't necessarily mean things will work out. I think our new boy Olesz is a perfect example of that. I think Olsen and Lalonde could be the real deal given time, and I imagine that's probably what Stan is thinking as well.
Are you just trolling, or are you really just this stupid? You lament about how, in the dark days, the 'Hawks were "foolishly squandering draft picks and free agent talent in favor of aging veterans" yet you're in favor of doing just that and/or gutting the very deep prospect system for a 2nd line center instead of either going with Kruger (whom the organization is very high on, for good reason) or if he doesn't pan out keeping Sharp at 2C where he was when we won a Cup. You claim that the Lepisto signing / Campoli release was handled wrong because he TOTALLY would have still been available after the arbitration hearing which is just idiotic especially from someone not even remotely in the know. The 'Hawks aren't paying market price for players? Then why are Toews and Kane making over $6 million, Kieth and Seabrook making over $5 million, Sharpie almost certainly guaranteed to get a raise to the $5.5M range, Bolland making over $3 million, and Frolik making $2.33 million? There is not a single argument that you make that holds ANY water whatsoever.
For a different view of Stan Bowman, see here: http://blackhawkup.com/2011/07/17/attaboy-stan/#more-5647 (note- i linked to your article in my comment section too.)




to the sales pages somewhere in your…
blog. if you want you can also use ppc advertising to promote the affiliate product. write your own ebook: create an ebook on your area of expertise and sell it on your blog. donations: ask for donations on your blog and…
good rule of thumb is not to…
obtain a card that has a limit over your monthly income. for example, if you make $1,500 a month, your line of credit should not exceed a maximum of $1,500.the goal of this first post-bankruptcy line of credit is to begin…
probably need a blogging service, rather than…
a freelance blogger.make your blogging cost-effectiveblog writing service providers are quite different. some of them have a set price and charge for the word count. let’s say one word will cost you 10 cent. now your next step is to decide…
when it comes to utilising these methods…
to write for your website.experience – most of us specialise in at least one field of work or knowledge, or at least have experience in a particular subject or niche, which means that when it comes to writing content, there is…
if you aren’t taking your own medicine,…
then that’s exactly what you are doing – lying to your readers.3. dig inthe most successful bloggers are not just bloggers, but niche activists. they live, eat, and breathe their subject matter, and they don’t leave it at the office at…
a blog. this is where marketing your…
blog comes in.the first tip in successful blog marketing is to recognize that when you first create a blog it is unknown to everyone. no one is aware of anything at all in regards to the blog if you don’t provide…
semester in more than one class. college…
students must write in an academic style that requires critical thinking with ideas and supporting detail clearly expressed, all grammatically correct at the time it is turned in. students need to learn, while still in middle and high school, to use…
need experienced staff to tackle critical issues,…
such as seo writing, website content, sales letters and so on. â· teams are wonderful if a webmaster is looking to do serious article marketing in the near future. â· a webmaster or service buyer might want to build a good…
your work. ask a friend or a…
trusted colleague for feedback on your polished draft before you submit it.if you follow the above steps and your boss still says, “you don’t write well,” consider asking for training to help you improve your skills, training that will ultimately ma…
The Ships’s Voyages…
I believe technological know-how just can make it worse. Now there’s a channel to hardly ever care, now there is not going to be considered a prospect for them to discover….
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Landon…
Hello my friend! I want to say that this post is amazing, great written and come with almost all important infos. I would like to see extra posts like this….
Zachary…
I am glad to be a visitant of this stark weblog, appreciate it for this rare info!…
Kudos For This Terrific Article…
Fantastic cool blog article. Genuinely thank you!…
Souls in the Waves…
Superior Early morning, I just stopped in to go to your internet site and assumed I would say I liked myself….
Gems from the internet…
[...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]……
Healing’s Dragon…
to search out concerns to boost my website!I suppose its ok to make usage of some of your respective ideas!!…
The Birch of the Shadow…
I think there may be a number of duplicates, but an exceedingly helpful listing! I have tweeted this. Several thanks for sharing!…
Whispering Misty about this…
yes yo you will skip the workshop!…
The Ships’s Voyages…
I believe know-how just causes it to be worse. Now there is a channel to hardly ever care, now there will not likely be a chance for them to discover….
Great post…
nice article that everyone should read…
Must read…
I read this really good article yesterday…
Great post…
exellent text that you should see…
Katalog Stron…
Everyone loves it when individuals come together and share ideas. Great website, continue the good work!…
Nenita Asif…
Keenan Legler…